ECG Guru - Instructor Resources

A gathering place for instructors of ECG and cardiac topics.

       

Subscribe to me on YouTube

ECG Basics: Pacemaker Failure to Capture

Dawn's picture
Sun, 04/27/2014 - 17:29 -- Dawn

This ECG is taken from a patient with an implanted pacemaker who was experiencing near-syncope.  She was taken to the hospital by EMS, where the pacemaker was adjusted to obtain ventricular capture.  This ECG did not have a Lead II rhythm strip, so the 12-lead ECG is being presented.  The P waves have been marked with a "P", pacemaker spikes marked with an arrow, and the QRS complexes marked with a "J" because they are junctional.  Because we can see 12 leads, or viewpoints, the morphology of the P waves and QRS complexes changes each time the machine switches to a new lead.

The underlying rhythm is sinus, with nearly regular P waves occuring at a rate of about 72 beats per minute.  The QRS complexes are also regular, but they are dissociated from the P waves.  Because the rate is near or just under 40 bpm, and the QRS complexes are narrow, this represents a slow junctional rhythm.  Because both atrial and ventricular rhythms are regular, but not associated with each other, an interpretation of complete heart block (third-degree AV block) can be made.  This explains why the patient had a pacemaker implanted.

The pacer spikes, for the most part, track the P waves, which is how this pacemaker is programmed.  They are not followed by a paced QRS complex, however.  This is failure to capture.  The second and fourth P waves did not stimulate a pacer spike because of their proximity to the T wave of the junctional beat.  The mA (energy setting) was adjusted in the Emergency Dept., and the pacemaker did not require repositioning.  The patient regained a reliable paced rhythm.

This section of the ECG Guru is meant to be for your basic students.  Pacemakers now have become very complex, with many options and variable settings.  So complex, that I would not feel comfortable getting into any more detail than I have here (although visitors to the site are welcome to).  It is important that, if you deal with patients in an emergency setting, you do not tell the patient that "something is wrong with their pacemaker" until it has been evaluated by a qualified person who can electronically interrogate the device.  It can be very difficult to determine from an ECG how a pacemaker is programmed, and how it should be reacting.  Since this patient had symptoms related to the bradycardia, and since pacemaker spikes occurred free of any refractory period and did not produce QRS complexes, it is safe to say there needs to be an adjustment.

In an emergency, with serious symptoms present, a transcutaneous or transvenous temporary pacemaker can be used.  Medications such as Atropine, epinephrine, and norepinephrine are also used, depending upon the type of AV block and the resources available.

 

Rate this content: 
Average: 5 (2 votes)

Comments

ekgpress@mac.com's picture

     Interesting tracing - that is presented as a “Basic” ECG - but which also has elements that are not “so basic”.

  • As emphasized by Dawn - assessment of pacing function on a simple 12-lead without awareness of programmed parameters is often complex and multifaceted. It is difficult without regular exposure to problematic pacer tracings to keep up with the ever increasing array of intricate pacing features. The sophistication (and accuracy) of these devices is amazing. Malfunctions do occur - but it helps to consider that more-often-than-not - there will be a physiologic reason for why the pacer is acting as it does.
  • As per Dawn - the pacer here is not capturing the ventricles, as no paced QRS follows any pacer spike.
  • The pacemaker however DOES appear to be sensing appropriately. Pacer spikes are seen after most P waves, and the P-to-spike interval is constant. The only times when pacer spikes are not seen is when the underlying P wave falls close to an escape-beat QRS. The pacer-to-spike interval is a bit long (more than 0.20 second) - which is probably to allow enough time to allow full opportunity for spontaneous P waves to conduct. No conduction occurs of course, because the underlying rhythm (and probable reason for the pacemaker) is complete AV block. But that is not the fault of the pacemaker. Simple adjustment with the mA (energy) setting was enough to regain reliable pacing. So pacing of the ventricles was not occurring - but not because of “malfunction” of the pacemaker.
What then is wrong with the patient?
  • As noted by Dawn - there are regular spontaneous P waves (at ~72/minute) and a regular narrow-QRS escape rhythm (at ~ 33/minute) - but NO P waves are conducting. Thus, the underlying rhythm is complete (3rd degree) AV block.
  • The escape focus is from somewhere within the conduction system - as the QRS is narrow. Hard to tell if this is an AV nodal escape rhythm (if so - the rate under 40/minute is a bit slow) - vs escape from the His.
  • Because the QRS is narrow - we can easily assess ST-T wave changes. Greatest abnormality is seen for the simultaneously occurring complexes in leads V1,V2,V3 - where the QT is prolonged and there is deep, symmetric T wave inversion. This strongly suggests ischemia, and possibly recent non-Q—wave anterior infarction. ST-T waves elsewhere show nonspecific ST-T wave flattening and perhaps slight depression. There may be slight ST elevation in aVR. Underlying coronary disease is likely. Additional history and tracings would be insightful for determining more.

Ken Grauer, MD  www.kg-ekgpress.com   [email protected] 

All our content is FREE & COPYRIGHT FREE for non-commercial use

Please be courteous and leave any watermark or author attribution on content you reproduce.